Arzu Bülbül
Corresponding Author, Cyprus Near East University
Ihsan Tolga Medeni
Adviser Assistant, Professor, Yıldırım Beyazıt University


Feasibility studies conducted in Turkey on 9 March 2003, implemented on Public-Private Partnership public private partnerships (PPP) model under Health city hospitals ,as the third phase of the Health Transformation Programme has been in operation. HIMSS (Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society) has Stage 6-7 certification in Turkey, working with the vision of improving patient-employee safety and health care quality by making better use of technology and knowledge 1.3 in Europe. Yozgat Public Hospital and Isparta Public Hospital are the first city hospitals where the study was applied.

This study, conducted between July and September 2017 in the HIMSS Stage 6-7 Yozgat and Isparta public hospital under the authority of the Ministry of Health – Department of Public Hospitals, involved the participation of 1000 health personel and included 50 questions with dependent and independent variables concerning the acceptance and usage of health related technology.

In this study, two health care workers in a city hospital with a certificate of HIMSS, the use of technology within the framework of the unified theory of adoption and use of technology on the effect of factors on intention to use it to analyse, and Health Information Technology (HIT) is ready, whether it has been revealed.Improving the quality and effectiveness of HIT services of both hospital health workers and using health technologies to improve services, performance expectation of users, expectation of effort, It shows that Social Impact and confidence perception ( p <0.05 )are positively affected.

In our study, it is stated that HIT is ready to use, will help facilitate the service and that its businesses will care about the service guided by technology. Although employees were concerned about problems with using HIT, it was announced that it would not take long to learn how to use the technology and that integration into the system would be rapid as users were licensed at training levels. In the study, it is seen that the attitudes and facilitating factors that support the use of information technologies are approved by the participant.

Key messages
  • Unified Technology Acceptance and Use Theory (UTAUT) provides a good framework for understanding the factors behind the adoption of health information technologies to access and use information in medical settings
  • Performance Expectation ,Trust Perception,Risk Perception,Effort Expectation,Social Impact,Facilitating Conditions, Behavioral Attitude,Intended Use,are the main factors that predict a health information technology attitude to access and use information in medical settings.

Keywords: Health Information Technology, Information Technologies, Acceptance Technologies.

  1. Ak, B. (2009). Health Informatics in Turkey, a Personal Evaluation and International Success Story: Corta tex. Academic Informatics’09 - XI. Academic Informatics Conference Proceedings. February 11-13, Sanliurfa: Harran University

  2. Alajmi, B. (2008).Understanding Knowledge-Sharing Behavior: A Theoretical Framework. USA: Rutgers -The State University of New Jersey.

  3. Ankara: Siyasal Kitapevi.

  4. Bandoyopadhyay, K. (2010). User acceptance of ERP systems in the United States,
  5. Bennani, A.E., & Oumlil, R. (2013). Factors fostering IT acceptance by nurses in Morocco: Short paper. IEEE 7th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), Paris, pp. 1-6.

  6. Bir Luhamya, FEK Bakkabulindi, PB Muyinda,( 2017) Integration of ICT in teaching and learning: a review of theories Makerere Journal of Higher Education Journal Home > Vol 9, No 1 (2017)
  7. Brown, G.D., Stone, T.T., & Patrick, T. B. (2005).Strategic management of ınformation systems in healthcare. Chicago: Health Administration Press.

  8. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742–52.
  9. Dauda Dansarki Isiyaku, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Suhaida Abdulkadir, (2015),
  10. dings/papers/PA139.pdf, (Erişim: 03.01.2011)
  11. Empirical modeling of information communication technology usage behaviour among business education teachers in tertiary colleges of a developing country South African Journal of Education Journal Home > Vol 35, No 4 (2015)
  12. Hersh, W. (2010). The Health Information Technology Workforce. Applied clinical informatics,197-212.
  13. HIMSS Turkey. (2017, 0825). ABOUT HIMSS / HIMSS EMRAM. Himms Turkey:
  14. Hsieh, H.L., Kuo, Y.M., Wang, S.R., Chuang, B.K., & Tsai, C.H. (2016).A study of personal health record user's behavioral model based on the pmt and utaut ıntegrative perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 14 (1).

  15. IMIARecommendation on education in medical informaticsMethods of Information in Medicine20003926777.

  16. Kanakubo, Takako; Hacıraz, Hadi (2019) 2. Comparison of the tendencies of the acceptance of electronic health records between USA and Japan hospitals. The Journal of Medical Systems Volume: 43 Subject: 7 Article number: 224
  17. Kavuncubası, S. (2000). Hospital and Health Institutions Management
  18. Kijsanayotin, B., Pannarunothai, S., & Speedie, S.M. (2009). Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand's community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model. International journal of medical informatics,78(6), 404-416.

  19. Kim S., Lee K.H., Hwang H. and Yoo S. (2016). Analysis of the factors influencing healthcare professionals’ adoption of mobile electronic medical record (EMR) using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in a tertiary hospital. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 16 (12),

  20. Koza, M. (2010)"Using Information Correctly "Knowledge Management.2nd Edition. Istanbul: Hourglass Publications.

  21. Nicolaou, A. ve Bchattacharya, S. (2006). Organizational performance effects of ERP systems usage: The impact of post implementation change, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 7:18-35.
  22. Phichitchaisopa, N., & Naenna, T. (2013).Factors affecting the adoption of healthcare informationtechnology.EXCLIJournal,12,413-436.

  23. Rodríguez, C., & Pozzebon, M. (2011).Understanding managerial behaviour during initial steps of a clinical information system adoption. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 11 (42),

  24. SA Fari,(2015) Applying Social Capital Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model in information and knowledge sharing research Inkanyiso: Journal of Humanities and Social SciencesJournalHome>Vol7,No1(2015)
  25. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., & Davis, G.B. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.

  26. Von Eiff MC, von Eiff W, Roth A and Ghanem M (2019) Employee Acceptance of Use: A Precondition for Enhancing Therapy Effectiveness, Patient Safety, and Economic Efficiency. Front. Public Health 7:353. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00353

  27. Yang, Z.,Kankanhalli, A., Ng,B.Y., & Lim, J.T.Y.(2013).Examining the pre-adoption stages of healthcare IT: A case study of vital signs monitoring systems. Decision Support Systems, 55 (3), 764-776.

  28. Yi Y., Wu Z. and Tung L. L. (2006) How Individual Differences Influence Technology Usage Behaviour? Toward an Integrated Framework Journal of Computer Information Systems 46(2): 52-63.